Surgical Planning Laboratory - Brigham & Women's Hospital - Boston, Massachusetts USA - a teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School

Surgical Planning Laboratory

The Publication Database hosted by SPL

All Publications | Upload | Advanced Search | Details view | Download Statistics | Help | Import | Log in
Collection:
Items displayed:

Gallery of images uploaded to the Publication Database.
870 images found.

PAGE 62 of 87
Figure 1: Right hippocampus, the top support vector from each group. Four views of each shape are shown.
Figure 1: Right hippocampus, the top support vector from each group. Four views of each shape are shown.
Figure 3: Left. Virtual colonoscopy tool screenshot with surface models and endoscopic views { Right. Reformatted slice with colon model and centerpath.
Figure 3: Left. Virtual colonoscopy tool screenshot with surface models and endoscopic views { Right. Reformatted slice with colon model and centerpath.
Figure 2: Segmenting up to 7 tissue classes with different methods
Figure 2: Segmenting up to 7 tissue classes with different methods
Figure 2: The top four plots show the deformation of the surfaces relative to the surface normal for the left amygdala-hippocampus complex.
Figure 2: The top four plots show the deformation of the surfaces relative to the surface normal for the left amygdala-hippocampus complex.
Figure 4: We transfer the 35 atlas labels to the patient mesh after matching the atlas mesh onto nine cases. The nine cases were thus labeled without manual intervention. The visualization of the labels with color coding indicates that the labels accurately match the patient brain geometry.
Figure 4: We transfer the 35 atlas labels to the patient mesh after matching the atlas mesh onto nine cases. The nine cases were thus labeled without manual intervention. The visualization of the labels with color coding indicates that the labels accurately match the patient brain geometry.
Figure 3: MIP of MR-PCA.
Figure 3: MIP of MR-PCA.
Figure 2: MR images of 3D models of the prostate gland obtained at 1.5 T and 0.5 T (same case as in Fig 1) in (a) superior and (b) lateral views. The central gland is yellow, and the peripheral zone is pink. Note that the gland changes from a flattened (posterior) gland at 1.5-T imaging to a round gland at 0.5-T imaging. The effect is most pronounced in the peripheral zone.
Figure 2: MR images of 3D models of the prostate gland obtained at 1.5 T and 0.5 T (same case as in Fig 1) in (a) superior and (b) lateral views. The central gland is yellow, and the peripheral zone is pink. Note that the gland changes from a flattened (posterior) gland at 1.5-T imaging to a round gland at 0.5-T imaging. The effect is most pronounced in the peripheral zone.
Figure 6: A graphical visualization is presented for the leftyright asymmetry of the amygdala–hippocampal complex for healthy controls (top row) and patients with schizophrenia (bottom row).
Figure 6: A graphical visualization is presented for the leftyright asymmetry of the amygdala–hippocampal complex for healthy controls (top row) and patients with schizophrenia (bottom row).
Figure 3: Axial 3D fast SPGR images obtained without fat suppression (a) before and (b) after the administration of contrast material. The tumor has high signal intensity and is isointense to fat. Arrows indicate the enhancing region.
Figure 3: Axial 3D fast SPGR images obtained without fat suppression (a) before and (b) after the administration of contrast material. The tumor has high signal intensity and is isointense to fat. Arrows indicate the enhancing region.
Figure 3: The activation maps (thresholded at p<10<sup>-6</sup> at the end of the 8th task block in each trial and the reference scan session (Fig. 3a from Subject A, and Fig. 3b from Subject B).The map is the maximum intensity projection across five slices that contained the ROI of the eloquent left primary/pre-motor and somatosensory areas (indicated with circle).The arrowhead (in Fig. 3b) indicates activation associated with the subject’s error by using left hand.
Figure 3: The activation maps (thresholded at p<10-6 at the end of the 8th task block in each trial and the reference scan session (Fig. 3a from Subject A, and Fig. 3b from Subject B).The map is the maximum intensity projection across five slices that contained the ROI of the eloquent left primary/pre-motor and somatosensory areas (indicated with circle).The arrowhead (in Fig. 3b) indicates activation associated with the subject’s error by using left hand.
PAGE 62 of 87 1...59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ...87